Shut Up, Be Nice, and Go on a Date
The short version
Most communication problems between partners are a mismatch, not a deficit. One person wants to be heard and the other shows up with a solution. The research on support says the unrequested solution often makes things worse, even when it's correct.
Your partner is the one person who gets no benefit of the doubt. We over-trust experts and under-trust the person across the kitchen table, because we know every one of their flaws. Being right is not enough to be listened to at home.
Communication is a skill, and most long-term couples have stopped practicing. The most common prescription I write for this is a regularly scheduled date. The first few are usually uncomfortable. That's the soreness, not a sign it isn't working.
A theme that keeps coming up in clinic has nothing to do with labs. It's two people who love each other and cannot seem to talk to each other.
The pattern is consistent enough that I can usually predict it. One partner brings up a problem. The other one fixes it. The first partner gets angrier. The second one is now confused, because the fix was good.
The whole thing turns on a question nobody asked out loud. What does this person need from me right now? Do they need to be heard, or are they actually looking for a solution?
I'm writing about this on a health blog on purpose. I've argued before that every category of your life affects your state of health, and relationships are near the top of that list. A meta-analysis of 148 studies and about 300,000 people found that those with stronger social relationships had roughly 50% better odds of survival over the follow-up period. That effect is in the same neighborhood as quitting smoking. The quality of your closest relationship is not a soft topic.
People take the advice they asked for
In my experience, people are receptive to advice they are actively seeking and not much else. That's as true in the exam room as it is at home.
The research on support in couples backs this up, and it's a little humbling. In a well-known diary study, researchers followed couples while one partner prepared for the bar exam. On days the stressed partner reported receiving support, they tended to feel worse, not better. The support that helped most was support the recipient didn't notice as support. The proposed reason is that visible help carries a second message underneath it: you can't handle this yourself.
I'll be fair to the other side. Later studies have been less tidy, and visible help does better when the person actually needs it and it's delivered well. But the direction is the useful part. Advice nobody requested lands as a judgment before it lands as advice.
The expert gets a pass. Your spouse doesn't.
There's one exception to the rule about unrequested advice, and it's authority. Psychologists call it authority bias. When we believe someone is a subject matter expert, because they wrote the book or did the training, we're much more likely to take their advice on that subject.
Unfortunately, we're also more likely to take their advice on subjects where they have no training and no experience at all. I'm a physician. People ask me about their cars or construction projects. They should not.
What I find hilarious is that a partnered relationship runs on the opposite bias. We view a spouse or a close friend as an equal, and we know every flaw they have. We've seen them lose their keys. So even when they hand us exactly the right answer, we discount it, because they're human, just like us. Then a stranger with a podcast says the same thing three weeks later and it's a revelation.
I don't know of a study that tests that precise comparison, so take it as clinical observation. What is established is that people in general underweight advice relative to their own opinion, even when the advice is better. At home, there's no credential to offset that. Being right buys you very little.
People stop dating each other
Communication gets better the way everything else does, which is practice. And the first thing to go in a long-term relationship is the practice. People stop dating each other. They do the minimum number of tasks to keep the household running, and they call the logistics a relationship.
So one of the most common prescriptions I give has no pharmacy attached. Take your significant other on a date. Put it on the calendar like you would a workout.
The data here is supportive and imperfect. A National Marriage Project report on more than 1,600 married couples found that spouses who had dedicated couple time at least once a week were about three and a half times more likely to report being very happy in the marriage, and reported better communication and lower odds of divorce. That's a cross-sectional survey. Happy couples may simply date more, and I can't tell you which way the arrow points.
The experimental evidence is smaller but cleaner. In a set of studies by Arthur Aron's group, long-term couples assigned to do something novel and mildly challenging together rated their relationship higher afterward than couples assigned something pleasant and routine. Which suggests the date does more work when it isn't the same dinner at the same table.
It's going to hurt at first
Dating is a lot like working out. When you start, you're not very good at it, and it hurts.
If you've been together a long time and you've neglected this, the first month or several months can be spent just working out the kinks. The resentment that built up from the neglect comes to dinner with you. That soreness is where most couples quit, the same way most people quit a training program in week two. They conclude that the dates are making things worse. They aren't. They're showing you what was already there.
The goal in the early going is modest. Start having fun and positive experiences together again. That's fundamental to John Gottman's work, which is the most cited body of research on what keeps couples together. In his observational studies, stable couples ran about five positive interactions for every negative one, even in the middle of a conflict. Couples headed for divorce were closer to one to one. In his newlywed study, the couples still married six years later had responded to each other's small bids for attention about 86% of the time. The ones who divorced were at about 33%.
Most of that isn't grand gestures. It's looking up from the phone. You are making deposits in an account, and the account has to have a balance before it can absorb a withdrawal.
Men, women, and the stereotype
There are stereotypical differences in how men and women communicate, and I'll state them with the caveat attached. Men tend to internalize and withhold, sometimes out of fear of criticizing a partner. Women, stereotypically, are more likely to say what's wrong, and sometimes say it too often.
The research partly supports the stereotype. In Gottman's lab, about 85% of the people who stonewalled, meaning shut down and stopped responding, were men. The pattern researchers call demand-withdraw, where one partner pushes for change and the other retreats, most often runs wife-demand, husband-withdraw.
It also partly takes the stereotype apart. When researchers had couples discuss an issue the husband wanted changed, the gap closed. The role follows who wants the change more than it follows gender. And on most measures of communication, the differences between men and women are small. Plenty of people act atypically for their gender, and plenty of couples have the roles reversed. Figure out which one you are, not which one you're supposed to be.
What I actually tell people
If you're the person who tries to solve every problem, and your relationships seem to be deteriorating anyway, just shut up. Holding your tongue is one of the most effective communication tools available. Sit there, listen, and try to understand the perspective of the person in front of you. A solution delivered to someone who wanted to be heard implies they're an idiot who couldn't have thought of it.
If you're the person who has a critical judgment on everything that's said, the fix is to be nice. People mostly don't need more praise. They need less criticism. That matches the psychology literature, where negative events reliably carry more weight than positive ones of the same size, and it's why the ratio is five to one and not one to one. Constant criticism does just as much damage as constant fixing.
Both of those come down to the same thing. Actually be interested in the person you're talking to, or practice being interested until you are. It's a muscle. It can be trained.
Three things to do
1. Ask the question out loud. The next time your partner brings you a problem, ask before you respond: do you want help with this, or do you want me to listen? It feels clumsy the first few times. It removes the single most common mismatch I see.
2. Put a date on the calendar this week, and then keep it recurring. Weekly if you can. Pick something you haven't done before over the usual dinner. If the first few are tense, that's the soreness. Keep showing up, the same way you would for the workout.
3. Run one week of your assigned homework. If you're the fixer, offer no solutions for seven days unless you're asked. If you're the critic, withhold the criticism and see what's left to say. You already know which one you are. If you don't, your partner does.
Sources:
Comments